Julianna Marcello/Fourth Estate

President Washington and Board of Visitors debate over antisemitism resolution

BY JULIANA MARCELLO, STAFF WRITER

On Thursday, Feb. 27, the Mason Board of Visitors (BOV) met to vote on the resolution (BOV meeting book pg. 300) regarding antisemitism. The Diversity Board committee first discussed the resolution at the Feb. 13 meeting, introduced by Visitor Jeffrey A. Rosen. 

The original resolution was drafted with concern due to the Week of Rage protests held by former Resident Student Organization (RSO) Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) in Fall 2024 from October 7-10th, as well as the uncovering of possible threats against the Jewish population by GMU students. 

At the meeting, protesters watched silently in the public seating area, holding signs of protest against the resolution. 

After re-introducing the resolution to the Board, Rosen said, “The purpose of this is to build on and help the university move to an even stronger place.” Rosen said that the Diversity Board committee believed that the resolution is anti-discriminatory and within the institution’s bounds. 

However, the resolution faced resistance from a number of Board members. According to Faculty Representative Solon Simmons, a large majority of Mason faculty believed that the original draft was unnecessary and an infringement on the Constitution’s First Amendment. 

Among the opposition, Graduate Student Representative Carolyn Faith Hoffman detailed experiences with Mason-sponsored courses and events that involved discussing Israel and Palestine. One course included a trip to Israel and the West Bank. Hoffman expressed concern over whether similar educational experiences would be able to continue under such a resolution. 

Undergraduate Student Body Representative Maria Cuesta, also spoke out against the resolution during the BOV meeting. To the Board,  Cuesta said, “I think that something to take away from those 300 plus comments is that even the Jewish students, faculty, staff, and community members don’t accept this.” The comments were left by the Mason community on the BOV minutes webpage in regards to the Feb. 13 meeting. 

President Gregory Washington expressed disappointment with both the original and revised resolution. “The reality is, this is an environment of education,” he critiqued. “People don’t always get things right and proper when they engage.”  

After a back-and-forth between Visitor Rosen, President Washington said, “this institution has to have the flexibility — to support discourse.” The president continued the sentiment by raising concern over the resolution’s vague language.

Revision 14 states that, “This board directs the University, including all of its administrative departments, offices, schools, and academic units, to refrain from sponsoring or endorsing any organization, event, or other activity whose position or posture is antisemitic under the [International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance] IHRA definition.” Members of the BOV were concerned with how the resolution would define, “sponsoring or endorsing” within its context. 

Visitor Dolly Oberoi criticized the language of the resolution and its interpretation, stating, “It has to be very easy to interpret because people outside of this room have to interpret [it], and who’s going to be the arbiter of whether it was right or wrong – somebody violated [it] or not.” She questioned why the resolution was not a general anti-discrimination policy rather than pinpointing one specific issue. 

President Washington requested the definition of “endorsement” to be added to the resolution. Washington’s request was denied by Visitor Rosen, who said that he “disagree[d] fundamentally” that its inclusion was necessary. This sparked further debate from all sides, including from Visitor Robert Pence who backed Visitor Rosen’s statement. 

Visitor Pence challenged the First Amendment in the case of the Revision, questioning President Washington’s stance. Pence commented on a past conversation that was had when first joining the BOV; a conversation had with President Washington. 

Shortly after the campus pro-Palestine protest of Oct. 7, 2024, Visitor Pence told President Washington, “The students are out there right now marching and chanting, ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.’ And I said, ‘I think they’re advocating genocide, to kill Jews, to push them … into the sea.’” 

Pence continued, questioning President Washington’s position and solidifying his beliefs in regards to the revision, “Would your position change if they were out there chanting ‘get the rope and hang them all’? … the answer is, it’s despicable, and I don’t think it should be allowed to be said.” Visitor Pence concluded by challenging the request for a definition and giving support for the resolution.

After a continued debate, the resolution was voted on and passed by a majority of eight. 

During the roll-call vote, a group of pro-Palestinian protestors rose and left the session. One unnamed protestor stood before exiting and stated, “This is a disgrace. You should all be ashamed.”